
Freedom-of-information data obtained by the Irish Examiner reveal that the State paid more than €2.8 million on commercial and charter flights to remove 205 people—including failed asylum seekers and convicted criminals—during 2025. Six dedicated charter operations cost nearly €1.3 million, averaging €6,243 per passenger, while the remainder was spent on scheduled services accompanied by Garda National Immigration Bureau escorts.
The disclosure comes as the Oireachtas debates the International Protection Bill 2026, which promises faster decisions and more efficient removals in line with the forthcoming EU Migration & Asylum Pact. Supporters argue that timely, enforceable returns are essential to protect the integrity of Ireland’s open labour market and the Common Travel Area with the UK. Critics counter that charter removals are expensive and opaque; a single November flight dubbed “Operation Trench” reportedly repatriated 35 people to Georgia and Moldova but cost over €200,000.
For global mobility teams managing non-EEA assignees, the figures underscore the importance of compliance. Overstaying visas or breaching work-permission terms can now lead to relatively swift enforcement compared with the pre-pandemic era, when deportation orders often languished for years. Employers should audit right-to-work documentation and ensure that Stamp 4 or Stamp 1G holders have timely renewal appointments—particularly given ongoing backlogs at the Immigration Service Delivery (ISD).
In this tightening compliance environment, VisaHQ’s Ireland platform (https://www.visahq.com/ireland/) can be an invaluable resource, offering step-by-step application support, document checks, and real-time status tracking for everything from short-stay visas to long-term permission renewals—helping both employers and assignees avoid costly overstays and last-minute scrambles.
The spend also has budgetary implications. At €2.8 million, removals equate to roughly 6 % of the Department of Justice’s €46 million allocation for International Protection supports, prompting NGOs to question whether funds might be better used for integration services. The Department insists charter flights remain cost-effective when group returns are arranged under EU readmission agreements.
Looking ahead, the International Protection Bill would set statutory six-month deadlines for first-instance decisions and appeals, theoretically shortening the window between refused asylum and removal. Mobility advisers should monitor whether the changes increase the pace of deportation orders in 2027 and beyond.
The disclosure comes as the Oireachtas debates the International Protection Bill 2026, which promises faster decisions and more efficient removals in line with the forthcoming EU Migration & Asylum Pact. Supporters argue that timely, enforceable returns are essential to protect the integrity of Ireland’s open labour market and the Common Travel Area with the UK. Critics counter that charter removals are expensive and opaque; a single November flight dubbed “Operation Trench” reportedly repatriated 35 people to Georgia and Moldova but cost over €200,000.
For global mobility teams managing non-EEA assignees, the figures underscore the importance of compliance. Overstaying visas or breaching work-permission terms can now lead to relatively swift enforcement compared with the pre-pandemic era, when deportation orders often languished for years. Employers should audit right-to-work documentation and ensure that Stamp 4 or Stamp 1G holders have timely renewal appointments—particularly given ongoing backlogs at the Immigration Service Delivery (ISD).
In this tightening compliance environment, VisaHQ’s Ireland platform (https://www.visahq.com/ireland/) can be an invaluable resource, offering step-by-step application support, document checks, and real-time status tracking for everything from short-stay visas to long-term permission renewals—helping both employers and assignees avoid costly overstays and last-minute scrambles.
The spend also has budgetary implications. At €2.8 million, removals equate to roughly 6 % of the Department of Justice’s €46 million allocation for International Protection supports, prompting NGOs to question whether funds might be better used for integration services. The Department insists charter flights remain cost-effective when group returns are arranged under EU readmission agreements.
Looking ahead, the International Protection Bill would set statutory six-month deadlines for first-instance decisions and appeals, theoretically shortening the window between refused asylum and removal. Mobility advisers should monitor whether the changes increase the pace of deportation orders in 2027 and beyond.









