
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) confirmed on Monday, December 8, that a chartered removal flight carrying 55 Iranian nationals departed an undisclosed U.S. airport bound for Tehran. It is the second such flight in a week, signaling that the Trump administration’s new directive to accelerate removals of nationals from countries it deems “un-cooperative” is moving from policy to practice.
Background and policy context
For decades, deportations to Iran were rare because Tehran routinely refused to issue travel documents and Washington generally granted protection to Iranian dissidents. That changed on January 20, when Executive Order 14161 required the Department of Homeland Security to negotiate or, if necessary, compel acceptance of removable nationals from 12 countries—including Iran—that allegedly obstruct U.S. repatriation efforts. ICE officers have since prioritized Iranians with final removal orders, many of whom had lived in the United States for years after overstaying visas or losing asylum claims.
What happened on the ground
According to Iranian foreign-ministry spokesperson Mojtaba Shasti Karimi, the 55 passengers “agreed to return voluntarily,” a characterization disputed by U.S. advocates who say most had exhausted appeals and were placed in expedited departure proceedings. The group included several long-term U.S. residents with minor criminal convictions and a handful of recent border crossers intercepted in Arizona. Upon arrival, returnees face mandatory security interviews by Iran’s Intelligence Ministry, prompting international rights groups to voice concern about potential mistreatment.
Business and mobility implications
Corporate mobility managers should note that ICE removal flights can limit the availability of commercial seats for voluntary return and raise the stakes for Iranian assignees who fall out of status. Companies employing Iranian nationals on work visas are advised to review I-9 files and ensure extension petitions are timely. The development also underscores heightened enforcement for any national from a country on DHS’s “non-compliant” list, increasing the risk profile for long-term expatriates with lapsed status.
Practical advice
1. Counsel employees from affected countries to carry proof of legal status at all times and to consult immigration counsel before international travel.
2. HR teams should build contingency plans—including remote-work options—if key staff are suddenly detained.
3. Mobility programs moving Iranian talent to the United States may need to redirect cases to third-country processing posts (e.g., Ankara or Abu Dhabi) where visa issuance remains possible but subject to extra scrutiny.
In the short term, expect additional weekly removal flights while diplomatic channels remain strained. Long term, advocacy groups are likely to challenge the policy in federal court, but no injunction is in place yet.
Background and policy context
For decades, deportations to Iran were rare because Tehran routinely refused to issue travel documents and Washington generally granted protection to Iranian dissidents. That changed on January 20, when Executive Order 14161 required the Department of Homeland Security to negotiate or, if necessary, compel acceptance of removable nationals from 12 countries—including Iran—that allegedly obstruct U.S. repatriation efforts. ICE officers have since prioritized Iranians with final removal orders, many of whom had lived in the United States for years after overstaying visas or losing asylum claims.
What happened on the ground
According to Iranian foreign-ministry spokesperson Mojtaba Shasti Karimi, the 55 passengers “agreed to return voluntarily,” a characterization disputed by U.S. advocates who say most had exhausted appeals and were placed in expedited departure proceedings. The group included several long-term U.S. residents with minor criminal convictions and a handful of recent border crossers intercepted in Arizona. Upon arrival, returnees face mandatory security interviews by Iran’s Intelligence Ministry, prompting international rights groups to voice concern about potential mistreatment.
Business and mobility implications
Corporate mobility managers should note that ICE removal flights can limit the availability of commercial seats for voluntary return and raise the stakes for Iranian assignees who fall out of status. Companies employing Iranian nationals on work visas are advised to review I-9 files and ensure extension petitions are timely. The development also underscores heightened enforcement for any national from a country on DHS’s “non-compliant” list, increasing the risk profile for long-term expatriates with lapsed status.
Practical advice
1. Counsel employees from affected countries to carry proof of legal status at all times and to consult immigration counsel before international travel.
2. HR teams should build contingency plans—including remote-work options—if key staff are suddenly detained.
3. Mobility programs moving Iranian talent to the United States may need to redirect cases to third-country processing posts (e.g., Ankara or Abu Dhabi) where visa issuance remains possible but subject to extra scrutiny.
In the short term, expect additional weekly removal flights while diplomatic channels remain strained. Long term, advocacy groups are likely to challenge the policy in federal court, but no injunction is in place yet.










