
ROME — Polling stations across Italy opened at 7 a.m. on Sunday, 22 March 2026, for a two-day confirmatory referendum that will decide the fate of a sweeping constitutional reform of the judiciary. Although the ballot formally concerns the separation of judges’ and prosecutors’ careers, it has morphed into a high-stakes confidence vote on Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni’s right-wing government and, in particular, its hard-line approach to migration.
For expats, companies and even Italian citizens abroad who suddenly need guidance on visas, work permits or re-entry formalities that may shift alongside this reform, VisaHQ’s online platform is a reliable one-stop shop. The service continuously tracks regulatory tweaks in Rome and at consulates worldwide, offers document checklists, and can courier applications directly to the correct authority; more details are available at https://www.visahq.com/italy/
Turn-out stood at 38 percent after the first 12 hours, according to the Interior Ministry, a figure analysts say is unusually brisk for a technical constitutional vote. Meloni has argued that a judiciary “hostile to the executive” has repeatedly stymied her plans to control irregular migration, most recently the controversial scheme to process some asylum-seekers at a purpose-built detention centre in neighbouring Albania. Cabinet ministers have openly blamed public prosecutors for blocking transfers and releasing migrants who challenge detention orders, claims that magistrates’ unions reject as political intimidation. For Italy’s extensive diaspora—the world’s second-largest after India—the referendum is equally significant. More than 5 million eligible voters living abroad were required to return postal ballots to their local consulates by 14 March. Corporate mobility managers have been advising Italian assignees to double-check their registration with AIRE (the Registry of Italians Resident Abroad) after several embassies, including New York and São Paulo, reported mail delays that could invalidate thousands of votes. If approved, the reform would split the High Council of the Judiciary (CSM) into two bodies, introduce separate career tracks, and tighten disciplinary oversight. Supporters say it will reduce conflicts of interest and accelerate criminal trials, a frequent complaint of foreign investors. Critics counter that it risks politicising the bench and undermining judicial independence – a concern echoed by the European Commission, which last week reminded Rome that rule-of-law conditionality could, in extreme cases, threaten access to EU funds. For global-mobility stakeholders, the referendum’s outcome will shape the regulatory climate in which work-permit refusals, detention orders and deportations are challenged in court. A “Yes” victory would likely embolden the government to press ahead with its Albania processing deal and with a draft decree that makes employers jointly liable for failed repatriations. A “No” result, by contrast, could stall the migration agenda and trigger cabinet reshuffles, introducing fresh uncertainty just as companies finalise summer assignment plans.
For expats, companies and even Italian citizens abroad who suddenly need guidance on visas, work permits or re-entry formalities that may shift alongside this reform, VisaHQ’s online platform is a reliable one-stop shop. The service continuously tracks regulatory tweaks in Rome and at consulates worldwide, offers document checklists, and can courier applications directly to the correct authority; more details are available at https://www.visahq.com/italy/
Turn-out stood at 38 percent after the first 12 hours, according to the Interior Ministry, a figure analysts say is unusually brisk for a technical constitutional vote. Meloni has argued that a judiciary “hostile to the executive” has repeatedly stymied her plans to control irregular migration, most recently the controversial scheme to process some asylum-seekers at a purpose-built detention centre in neighbouring Albania. Cabinet ministers have openly blamed public prosecutors for blocking transfers and releasing migrants who challenge detention orders, claims that magistrates’ unions reject as political intimidation. For Italy’s extensive diaspora—the world’s second-largest after India—the referendum is equally significant. More than 5 million eligible voters living abroad were required to return postal ballots to their local consulates by 14 March. Corporate mobility managers have been advising Italian assignees to double-check their registration with AIRE (the Registry of Italians Resident Abroad) after several embassies, including New York and São Paulo, reported mail delays that could invalidate thousands of votes. If approved, the reform would split the High Council of the Judiciary (CSM) into two bodies, introduce separate career tracks, and tighten disciplinary oversight. Supporters say it will reduce conflicts of interest and accelerate criminal trials, a frequent complaint of foreign investors. Critics counter that it risks politicising the bench and undermining judicial independence – a concern echoed by the European Commission, which last week reminded Rome that rule-of-law conditionality could, in extreme cases, threaten access to EU funds. For global-mobility stakeholders, the referendum’s outcome will shape the regulatory climate in which work-permit refusals, detention orders and deportations are challenged in court. A “Yes” victory would likely embolden the government to press ahead with its Albania processing deal and with a draft decree that makes employers jointly liable for failed repatriations. A “No” result, by contrast, could stall the migration agenda and trigger cabinet reshuffles, introducing fresh uncertainty just as companies finalise summer assignment plans.