
In a late-night vote on 18 December, five of Cyprus’ six Members of the European Parliament supported opening negotiations with the Council to create a common EU list of ‘safe countries of origin’. The proposal would allow asylum authorities—including Cyprus’ Asylum Service—to fast-track and generally refuse claims from nationals of Bangladesh, India, Egypt, Morocco, Tunisia, Colombia and Kosovo, unless applicants can prove individual risk.
The measure is championed by centre-right and conservative groups that argue a harmonised list will cut processing backlogs and curb secondary movements within the EU. Critics, including human-rights NGOs and the AKEL party’s sole dissenting Cypriot MEP, warn that blanket designations ignore complex security and rights situations in the countries concerned.
If finalised, the regulation would dovetail with Cyprus’ existing strategy of prioritising returns. Migration Deputy Minister Nikolas Ioannides said the vote shows “growing European recognition of the need for realistic, rules-based migration management.” The Asylum Service has already begun mapping operational changes, including accelerated interviews and shorter appeal windows for claimants from the seven states.
For employers, the development could affect workforce planning where staff or dependants hail from newly ‘safe’ countries. Individuals whose protection claims are refused are likely to lose legal-stay status quickly, increasing the importance of employer-sponsored permits or intra-company transfer schemes. Mobility advisers should review contingency options such as remote work from third jurisdictions or short-term Schengen visas where permissible.
For companies and individuals who need to pivot swiftly to alternative visa categories, VisaHQ’s Cyprus portal (https://www.visahq.com/cyprus/) offers clear, up-to-date guidance on work permits, Schengen visas and document requirements. Its digital tools and live support can help applicants compile paperwork and track processing times, providing timely assistance when contingency plans must be activated.
Trilogues with the Council and Commission are scheduled for early 2026; Cypriot officials will seek assurances that member states retain some discretion to account for local labour-market needs when implementing the list.
The measure is championed by centre-right and conservative groups that argue a harmonised list will cut processing backlogs and curb secondary movements within the EU. Critics, including human-rights NGOs and the AKEL party’s sole dissenting Cypriot MEP, warn that blanket designations ignore complex security and rights situations in the countries concerned.
If finalised, the regulation would dovetail with Cyprus’ existing strategy of prioritising returns. Migration Deputy Minister Nikolas Ioannides said the vote shows “growing European recognition of the need for realistic, rules-based migration management.” The Asylum Service has already begun mapping operational changes, including accelerated interviews and shorter appeal windows for claimants from the seven states.
For employers, the development could affect workforce planning where staff or dependants hail from newly ‘safe’ countries. Individuals whose protection claims are refused are likely to lose legal-stay status quickly, increasing the importance of employer-sponsored permits or intra-company transfer schemes. Mobility advisers should review contingency options such as remote work from third jurisdictions or short-term Schengen visas where permissible.
For companies and individuals who need to pivot swiftly to alternative visa categories, VisaHQ’s Cyprus portal (https://www.visahq.com/cyprus/) offers clear, up-to-date guidance on work permits, Schengen visas and document requirements. Its digital tools and live support can help applicants compile paperwork and track processing times, providing timely assistance when contingency plans must be activated.
Trilogues with the Council and Commission are scheduled for early 2026; Cypriot officials will seek assurances that member states retain some discretion to account for local labour-market needs when implementing the list.






