Parliament has approved amendments to the Act on Social Assistance that take effect on 1 February 2026. Claimants will have to exhaust all ‘primary’ benefits—such as earnings-related unemployment allowance—and register as full-time job-seekers before receiving social assistance. Non-compliance can trigger a 2–3 percent cut in the basic allowance, and the €150 earned-income deduction will be abolished.
While not strictly an immigration measure, the reform directly affects newly arrived family members and low-income residence-permit holders who rely on welfare during integration. Employers using local-hire contracts must verify whether net-pay guarantees or mobility allowances remain adequate, especially in high-cost areas like Espoo and Vantaa.
For employers and individuals needing clarity on how these benefit changes intersect with residence permits and family reunification visas, VisaHQ’s Finland portal (https://www.visahq.com/finland/) offers up-to-date guidance and document-check services. Their specialists can walk applicants through income-sufficiency thresholds, help compile supplementary evidence, and flag any visa-category alternatives that mitigate the risk of benefit-related refusals.
![Tighter Social-Assistance Rules Could Hit Migrant Households from February 2026]()
Kela will update its online calculators in January 2026, but NGOs fear the tougher regime may push vulnerable groups into undeclared work. The government counters that the policy aligns with broader employment-service reforms and will incentivise labour-market participation.
Corporate HR departments should brief staff on new obligations, adjust relocation budgets where necessary and monitor whether benefit reductions affect residence-permit renewals tied to income sufficiency.
The debate echoes trends in Denmark and the UK, where welfare conditionality has increasingly intersected with immigration status, underscoring the importance of holistic mobility planning.
While not strictly an immigration measure, the reform directly affects newly arrived family members and low-income residence-permit holders who rely on welfare during integration. Employers using local-hire contracts must verify whether net-pay guarantees or mobility allowances remain adequate, especially in high-cost areas like Espoo and Vantaa.
For employers and individuals needing clarity on how these benefit changes intersect with residence permits and family reunification visas, VisaHQ’s Finland portal (https://www.visahq.com/finland/) offers up-to-date guidance and document-check services. Their specialists can walk applicants through income-sufficiency thresholds, help compile supplementary evidence, and flag any visa-category alternatives that mitigate the risk of benefit-related refusals.
Kela will update its online calculators in January 2026, but NGOs fear the tougher regime may push vulnerable groups into undeclared work. The government counters that the policy aligns with broader employment-service reforms and will incentivise labour-market participation.
Corporate HR departments should brief staff on new obligations, adjust relocation budgets where necessary and monitor whether benefit reductions affect residence-permit renewals tied to income sufficiency.
The debate echoes trends in Denmark and the UK, where welfare conditionality has increasingly intersected with immigration status, underscoring the importance of holistic mobility planning.
